As of March 2, 2009, Skittles.com has crossed into a new frontier. As you can read in the comments from the previous company of the week (Apple), transparency is a good thing, but to what extent do stakeholders need to know what you’re making available? In Public Relations Online, author Tom Kelleher writes about “usefulness of information”. He explains that stakeholders want useful information, not just a ton of it.

When you go to the new skittles.com, you are asked to check a box (sign a waiver) informing them that you understand that anything beyond checking this box is out of Skittles’ control. If transparency or authenticity is what they’re going for, they missed the mark big time. It’s like Skittles is saying “welcome to our site, but beware, anything you see here isn’t actually our site”. Some think this “experiment” will be counterproductive as customers will be turned off by the lack of transparency: they’ll have to dig for any bit of relevant information.

So now what happens when a consumer goes to skittles.com to find something specific? Where is the search box? Where is the navigation bar? The website has completely transformed into a gateway to social network pages. I put skittles.com into the wayback machine and got the previous version of their site. It was extremely colorful (like the candy) with links to games and still just as useless information-wise as their new site. Maybe skittles.com was meant to be…useless.